P.T.E EXAM MATERIAL

The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education- Einstein. What does he mean by that? And do you think he is correct? Many people believe that formal education is the only way to learn and acquire knowledge. However, Albert Einstein had a different view on the process of learning and the concept of education. This essay is going to analyse his quote and compare the difference between education and learning. Education is the formal way of giving knowledge by someone who has it to someone who does not acquired it yet. However, it seems like Einstein had a different view to process of learning and there is some fundamental truth behind his words. Firstly, education is biased and usually limited to knowledge of an educator. Secondly, education does not guarantee to give correct knowledge, it can be totally and utterly wrong, we can refer to an example when teacher taught students that our planet is flat. Finally, education gives narrowed down knowledge which was

The space travel is fantastic these days and they are very fascinate towards its but there are many environmental problems in our planet we should resolve the problems or travel space and spend a lot of money? It is highly a debatable issue that government should spend money on space travel rather than on environmental issues because both are mandatory for mankind. Therefore, government should allocate equal resources to both. Let discuss both views in detail in the upcoming paragraphs. To begin with, space travel is the responsibility of government for the welfare of people on earth because when the research would be done then it would definitely aids to humankind such as scientist would find out the treatment about incurable diseases and can save the precious life of person by the doctors or specialists. Moreover, natural resources that are going to scarce on the earth can found and on other planet, these resources such as fossil fuels, minerals and water are important to l

It is irrefutable that law plays a significant role in human's life. The governments of a particular nation pass these laws and people should follow them. However, a significant number of people believe that law changes the behavior of people. But I disagree with this notion as I have some logical and rational reasons to explain this statement. Let discuss all the views in the upcoming paragraphs. To begin with, there is no denying the fact that laws are made for the safety of people but natives either in developed or in developing countries break the laws which put them as well as others in trouble. For instance, there is a law of vandalism but when people roaming in the public parks and gardens, they start plucking the flowers without thinking about vandalism law. Mostly opulent people do not bother about that law because there is no rigorous punishment and heavy fine over this practice. In this way, linear traditional laws can never change the attitude of person. Furth

 “In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples? While reading the statement there are lot of things that can be said on war of ideas” first of all I will clear this statement that war of ideas means the decision which is made on spot. I am partially agreed with statement and give my viewpoints in upcoming paragraphs. Firstly elaborating, it can be said that there are lot of steps  taken by politicians such as Russia that threw bombs on Yemen to kill members of terrorist group “lakshar-e-Taliban”, so by these steps peace cannot be maintained and it would not be good for mankind. Numerous countries join the international meeting against the terrorists in USA. Secondly if discussing about cons of this statement are that some countries that give orders to attack on other countries to kill terrorists like America and Russia, but in some situation’s reco